Champagne found in Shipwreck, World’s Oldest.(Video Included)

A diver takes out bottles of about 200-year-old champagne and secures the corks so they will not open from the pressures of the cold and deep water / AFP Source: AFP

Wine experts today popped the corks of two bottles of champagne recently salvaged from the bottom of the Baltic Sea, where they had lain in a sunken ship for nearly 200 years.
They gently eased the fragile corks from the dark brown bottles – one from the house of Veuve-Clicquot and the other from the now extinct house of Juglar, in front of an large audience of reporters and wine enthusiasts in the capital of the autonomous Finnish province of Aaland.

The first taste went to Richard Juhlin, one of the world’s foremost champagne experts, who could not hold back an appreciative “Ah!”

He described the Juglar as “more intense and powerful, mushroomy” and the Veuve-Clicquot as more like Chardonnay, with notes of “linden blossoms and lime peels”.

As the contents were poured into rows of waiting glasses for others, the aroma was more pungent than any modern wine or champagne: a thick, nose-wrinkling and quite cheesy bouquet that could be smelled several yards away.

Read the full story in the “Courier Mail” also source of photo’s.
Fancy finding Champagne in a shipwreck, I don’t know if I would be game to taste it, but I don’t drink at all, so that’s not surprising. I’m sure there are a lot of people that would love to have a glass of this Champagne. They said in the article that it was going to be auctioned, they think it will sell for about Aus$135,000. Well I don’t know much about Champagne, but for that amount of money, I’d want some pure gold or something with it.

This entry was posted in History and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Champagne found in Shipwreck, World’s Oldest.(Video Included)

  1. travelrat says:

    Well, you wouldn’t catch me paying that much for a bottle of vino that’s going to finish up in the same place as one that cost £10 or so … in my book, wine is for drinking, not for being clever about, and one-upping other so-called experts.

    Whisky, now … that is another matter (pouring himself a dram of 15-year-old Glenfarclas) 😀

    • magsx2 says:

      Hi travelrat,
      It seems a ridiculous amount of money to me as well. I can think of plenty of other things I could spend that sort of money on.

      Hubby would love to share in a glass of Whiskey with you, have you got enough for a another glass. 🙂

  2. magsx2 says:

    Hi travelrat,
    Hubby said to hang on to them it will only take 22 hrs to get there on the next flight. 😆

  3. Jill says:

    Oh I would love to have a taste of the champagne, what a talking point that would be. I also wouldn’t pay that much money for a drink. 🙂

    • magsx2 says:

      Hi Jill,
      It certainly would be a talking a point, I’m sure a lot of people would be curious on how it tasted. It’s a hell of a lot of money, I wonder if the people that end up buying the champagne will ever open the bottle?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s